1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post Reply
daviscfad
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:57 am
Contact:

1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by daviscfad » Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:39 pm

What did pcgs give it?
Attachments
download-ccfopt.jpg

shasta7
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:54 pm
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by shasta7 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:22 pm

Knowing PCGS... they prably graded it low... either MS63 or MS-64... or am I way off???

daviscfad
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:57 am
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by daviscfad » Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:13 pm

Ms 65

User avatar
AndyO
Site Admin
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:31 pm
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by AndyO » Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:51 pm

I would agree that MS65 is the right grade Not many marks, but the strike is holding it back from going any farther.

The problem is that PCGS has SO MANY over-graded Ikes out there that it's maddening. I've ranted about that for years. That coin is better than one of the PCGS MS67's I own. The ridiculous rash of pseudo PR70 Ikes has thankfully stemmed as of late also, but the damage is done. The market is flooded with over-graded junk. PCGS did both themselves and the hobby no favors by opening those floodgates for the last 10 years.

Honestly, I feel PCGS has gotten much more consistent and had far fewer over-grades since they kicked David Hall to the curb (I was never a fan of him if you hadn't picked up on that...), despite a lot of opinions from the hobby about his firing being a travesty. I don't think Don Willis did any favors there either.
Authorized CAC and QA dealer

daviscfad
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:57 am
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by daviscfad » Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:35 pm

Honestly Andy thats why it bothered me. I felt the coin looked better than one of the 67s on pcgs website now.. I was hoping 66 maybe a plus grade, but 65 was unfortunate.
I think another thing that bugs me is I feel like they grade the silver ikes higher than they should. I sent some pegs in that got 65 and they look like 63 to me compared to the coin listed. I thought the strike was good looming at the cheek but dis notice it was week in trust. Take a look on pcgs and judge the three ikes shown there. Its crazy how much one looks and its 67

User avatar
AndyO
Site Admin
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:31 pm
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by AndyO » Thu Feb 13, 2020 7:31 am

66 wouldn't upset me on your coin. The first one on Coinfacts is definitely not worthy of 67 in my opinion. Not wild about the second.

I actually own the sister to the third one on Coinfacts, came out of the same bag and graded at the same time. They are both Peg Legs of the same die. Mine is a 66+, but I like it better given its luster and subtle color. However, it too has a very mushy motto strike, so, it ought to be a MS65+ ( or lower). I suppose that's why the other went 67 at the time, the overall strike is better.
1971 D peg leg.jpg
Authorized CAC and QA dealer

daviscfad
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:57 am
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by daviscfad » Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:19 pm

Thats a beauty for sure!

daviscfad
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:57 am
Contact:

Re: 1971-d ike you vs pcgs

Post by daviscfad » Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:26 pm

This Friendly eagle also got a 65 a couple of years ago. This does not even get up the same day as my original coin but it came back same grade.
The peg leg came back a 66 and look at that cheek
Attachments
83940779_medium.jpg
83940783_Large.jpg

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests